Central Land Council
in this section
CLC Press Releases
- 14 Augyust 2008 2008
- Communities have their say on intervention ›› more
- 31 July 2008 2008
- Fairfax news in bad taste ›› more
- 24 July 2008 2008
- election: accountability needed ›› more
- 17 July 2008 2008
- Royal commission needed into NT funding ›› more
- 11 July 2008 2008
- Simpson Desert: the last land rights claim under the Aboriginal Land Rights Act ›› more
- 8 July 2008 2008
- Sacred site damage at Wilora ›› more
- 30 May 2008
- Seal the Mereenie Loop Road Now ›› more
- 27 May 2008
- Angela Pamela Negotiations ›› more
- 9 May 2008
- Angela Pamela and the native title process ›› more
- 18 February 2008
- Coalition should support permit system ›› more
- 15 February 2008
- Politicians threaten to derail fresh start ›› more
- 22 January 2008
- Police ignorance upsets Lajamanu community ›› more
- 26 November 2007
- Optimism for a fresh consensual approach on Aboriginal affairs ›› more
- 21 November 2007
- Concerns over Central Petroleum tactics ›› more
Press Release
The Land Rights Act amendments: Cost outweighs benefits
5 October 2005
Download an Adobe Acrobat version of this document
The Central Land Council says that amendments to the Aboriginal Land Rights Act for whole-of-community leases on Aboriginal land are unnecessary, expensive and will prevent traditional owners having any control over future commercial developments on Aboriginal land.
The Australian Government has today announced changes which will enable the Northern Territory Government to lease entire communities and subsequently sub-lease to whoever it chooses.
CLC Director David Ross said that while the Central Land Council welcomed the voluntary nature of these new arrangements, it was concerned that the costs for surveys and administration – likely to run into millions of dollars – will far outweigh any benefits that the amendments would deliver.
"Aboriginal people are being forced to pay for these new arrangements from the Aboriginal Benefits Account which is for community development purposes. Furthermore, they are being asked to forfeit any benefits from commercial development on their communities in the future," Mr Ross said.
"I think that the amendments are probably unnecessary given the Government was unable to detail or provide any evidence of shortcomings in the lease provisions of the existing legislation.
"It is a waste to introduce a whole new land tenure system merely because successive NT Governments have refused to acknowledge or utilise the Aboriginal Land Rights Act," he said.
Mr Ross said proper application of the Aboriginal Land Rights Act and the NT Planning Act would have resolved any so called 'uncertainties' or issues concerning ownership of assets.
"If tenure is at the heart of community infrastructure and development problems, why hasn't the NT Government removed impediments to leasing on communities off Aboriginal land? On these communities, legislation does not allow any leases for commercial development," Mr Ross said.
The Central Land Council had put forward a model of a three tiered leasing system using the existing provisions of the Act based on the main categories of land users in communities: residential housing, government infrastructure and commercial operations.
"The CLC's model would have ensured we can tackle the most immediate issues relating to community housing stocks as a priority, while still clarifying and streamlining other leasing and service delivery arrangements," Mr Ross said.
Contact Jane Hodson 0889516217 0417877579